SMU Mustangs Double Bottom: Two Oversold Entries Delivered +26.7% and +38.9%

California Golden BearsCAL 20 — 59 SMUSMU Mustangs
2026-10-24

2026-10-24

Login to see the interactive sport charts →

California vs SMU market analysis Oct 24: The Setup

Asset: SMU Mustangs (home favorite) | Opening: $0.896 | Spread: SMU -18.5 | Kalshi: —

This California vs SMU market analysis Oct 24 opens with SMU installed as an 18.5-point home favorite at Gerald J. Ford Stadium, entering at 5-1 while California arrived at 3-4. The spread implied a dominant Mustangs performance, but the first half delivered a genuine contest before the market reasserted itself.

The Pattern: Double Bottom — SMU's game signal dipped to $0.750 in early Q2, partially recovered, then dipped again to $0.684 before the second bounce carried all the way to $1.000.

Going in: The opening price of $0.896 reflected strong pre-game confidence in SMU; a buy signal would require the game signal to pull back meaningfully below that level while RSI confirmed oversold conditions.


Who Decided It

  • SMU Mustangs (6-1): Kevin Jennings went 16-of-23 for 223 yards and three touchdown passes; Kendrick Raphael added 104 rushing yards and two touchdowns on 22 carries.
  • California Golden Bears (3-5): Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele completed 27-of-37 for 265 yards but was sacked three times in the second half, and the Bears managed no points after halftime.

First Quarter: Favorite Under Early Pressure

Outlook check: The pre-game outlook called for SMU to hold its dominant position; California's opening drive challenged that immediately.

California's offense opened with a 13-play, 65-yard drive capped by Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele's 10-yard touchdown pass to Chase Hendricks at Q1 10:28, pushing the game signal down to $0.792 with RSI collapsing to 6.2 — deeply oversold territory. SMU responded with a Brendan Baird 29-yard field goal at Q1 7:41 ($0.815, RSI 40.7), then Kevin Jennings found Kendrick Raphael for a 22-yard touchdown pass at Q1 2:47, flipping the lead to 10-7 and lifting the signal to $0.894 by quarter's end.

Time Play Score Game Signal RSI Kalshi SMU
Q1 15:00 Kickoff CAL 0, SMU 0 $0.896 — —
Q1 10:28 Hendricks 10-yd TD (Sagapolutele pass) CAL 7, SMU 0 $0.792 6.2 —
Q1 7:41 Baird 29-yd FG CAL 7, SMU 3 $0.815 40.7 —
Q1 2:47 Raphael 22-yd TD (Jennings pass) CAL 7, SMU 10 $0.894 66.5 —
Q1 0:00 End Q1 CAL 7, SMU 10 $0.900 63.3 —

Decision Point: Hold Through Q1 Volatility

Time Score Game Signal RSI MACD Kalshi SMU
Q1 0:00 CAL 7, SMU 10 $0.900 63.3 — —

Known at the time: SMU led 10-7 at the quarter break. The game signal had recovered from the Q1 10:28 oversold dip (RSI 6.2) back to $0.900. RSI exited oversold territory at Q1 9:17 (RSI 45.0), signaling a bounce. No entry criteria had been met yet — the signal was back near opening levels.

The decision: Stay out. The Q1 dip was sharp but brief, and the signal recovered before a tradeable setup formed.

Outlook for Q2: A second dip below $0.800 with RSI re-entering oversold territory would create the first leg of a potential double bottom entry.


Second Quarter: The Double Bottom Forms

Outlook check: The Q1 outlook called for a second dip — California delivered it immediately, and then a third.

Mason Mini's 1-yard touchdown run at Q2 10:46 put California ahead 14-10, sending the game signal to $0.789 with RSI at 26.3. SMU's ensuing three-and-out punt left the signal sliding further. With Kevin Jennings throwing an incomplete pass at Q2 10:29, the game signal reached $0.750 and RSI hit 18.3 — the first entry trigger. California continued to press: Towns McGough's 41-yard field goal at Q2 5:12 extended the lead to 17-10, pushing the signal to $0.688. The game signal's second trough arrived at Q2 7:09 ($0.684, RSI 23.2) as Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele completed a short pass to Taimane Purcell for 6 yards. RSI exited oversold at Q2 5:16 (RSI 40.9). Kendrick Raphael's 1-yard touchdown run at Q2 1:57 tied the game at 17, and McGough's 37-yard field goal as time expired sent SMU to halftime trailing 20-17.

Time Play Score Game Signal RSI Kalshi SMU
Q2 10:46 Mini 1-yd TD run CAL 14, SMU 10 $0.789 26.3 —
Q2 10:29 Jennings incomplete pass CAL 14, SMU 10 $0.750 18.3 —
Q2 7:09 Sagapolutele pass to Purcell, 6 yds CAL 14, SMU 10 $0.684 23.2 —
Q2 5:16 RSI exits oversold CAL 14, SMU 10 $0.712 40.9 —
Q2 5:12 McGough 41-yd FG CAL 17, SMU 10 $0.688 34.6 —
Q2 1:57 Raphael 1-yd TD run CAL 17, SMU 17 $0.814 63.7 —
Q2 0:00 McGough 37-yd FG CAL 20, SMU 17 $0.753 45.2 —

Decision Point 1: First Bottom — Long SMU at $0.750

Time Score Game Signal RSI MACD Kalshi SMU
Q2 10:29 CAL 14, SMU 10 $0.750 18.3 −0.96 (hist) —

Known at the time: The game signal had dropped from $0.896 to $0.750 following Mini's touchdown and SMU's three-and-out. RSI was at 18.3 — deep oversold. MACD histogram was −0.96 with the line at −2.51. The play at this moment was Jennings's incomplete pass on the ensuing drive. SMU trailed by four with over 10 minutes left in the half.

The decision: Enter Long SMU at $0.750. The game signal had pulled back sharply from the opening, RSI was deeply oversold, and SMU's spread-implied dominance remained intact. This California vs SMU market analysis Oct 24 marks this as the first bottom of the double bottom structure.

Outlook for the next quarter: Confirmation would come from the signal recovering above $0.800; a further drop toward $0.680 would test the thesis but could offer a second entry.

Decision Point 2: Second Bottom — Add Long SMU at $0.684

Time Score Game Signal RSI MACD Kalshi SMU
Q2 7:09 CAL 14, SMU 10 $0.684 23.2 −0.58 (hist) —

Known at the time: The signal had not recovered — it slid further to $0.684 as California's offense continued to move the ball. RSI remained oversold at 23.2. MACD histogram was −0.58. The play was Sagapolutele's completion to Purcell for 6 yards, keeping California's drive alive.

The decision: Enter Long SMU at $0.684. The second dip below $0.700 with RSI still oversold confirmed the double bottom structure. SMU remained the 18.5-point favorite; the market had overreacted to California's early scoring.

Outlook for Q3: SMU needed to retake the lead in the second half. A failure to score on the opening Q3 drive would pressure both positions.


Third Quarter: Confirmation and Acceleration

Outlook check: The Q2 outlook called for SMU to retake the lead — Christian Rhodes delivered it on the opening Q3 drive.

Rhodes's 5-yard touchdown run at Q3 10:11 put SMU ahead 24-20 ($0.868, RSI 79.5), immediately validating both entries. Woo Spencer sacked Sagapolutele for −7 yards at Q3 10:02, and after Yamir Knight returned a punt 26 yards to the CAL35 at Q3 8:50, Kevin Jennings hit Derrick McFall for a 21-yard touchdown at Q3 7:26 ($0.953, RSI 90.4). Rhodes added his second touchdown at Q3 4:04 ($0.990, RSI 94.9), and SMU closed the quarter leading 38-20 with the game signal at $0.996.

Time Play Score Game Signal RSI Kalshi SMU
Q3 10:11 Rhodes 5-yd TD run CAL 20, SMU 24 $0.868 79.5 —
Q3 7:26 McFall 21-yd TD (Jennings pass) CAL 20, SMU 31 $0.953 90.4 —
Q3 4:04 Rhodes 3-yd TD run CAL 20, SMU 38 $0.990 94.9 —
Q3 0:00 End Q3 CAL 20, SMU 38 $0.996 88.2 —

Decision Point: Hold Both Long Positions

Time Score Game Signal RSI MACD Kalshi SMU
Q3 0:00 CAL 20, SMU 38 $0.996 88.2 — —

Known at the time: Both positions were deeply profitable. The game signal had risen from $0.750 and $0.684 to $0.996. RSI was overbought at 88.2, but no exit signal had triggered — the system targets RSI 97.9 at game end.

The decision: Hold. The exit signal had not fired; the game was effectively decided with SMU leading by 18.

Outlook for Q4: Barring a collapse, both positions would exit at game end.


Fourth Quarter: Running Out the Clock

Outlook check: The Q3 outlook held — SMU added three more touchdowns and California scored nothing.

Kendrick Raphael's third touchdown of the game came at Q4 11:23 (SMU 45-20), Kevin Jennings found Jalen Hale for a 17-yard score at Q4 6:29 (SMU 52-20), and EJ Kelly capped the scoring with a 10-yard run at Q4 2:33 (SMU 59-20). The game signal held at $0.999 throughout before settling to $0.950 at the final whistle with RSI at 97.9.

Time Play Score Game Signal RSI Kalshi SMU
Q4 11:23 Raphael 1-yd TD run CAL 20, SMU 45 $0.999 87.2 —
Q4 6:29 Hale 17-yd TD (Jennings pass) CAL 20, SMU 52 $0.999 87.2 —
Q4 2:33 Kelly 10-yd TD run CAL 20, SMU 59 $0.999 87.2 —
Q4 0:00 End of game CAL 20, SMU 59 $0.950 97.9 —

Decision Point: Exit Both Positions at Game End

Time Score Game Signal RSI MACD Kalshi SMU
Q4 0:00 CAL 20, SMU 59 $0.950 97.9 −0.03 (hist) —

Known at the time: The game ended with SMU winning 59-20. RSI reached 97.9 — the exit signal. Both long positions closed at $0.950.

The decision: Exit both Long SMU positions. Trade 1 (entered $0.750) closed at +26.7%; Trade 2 (entered $0.684) closed at +38.9%.


Final Accounting

This California vs SMU market analysis Oct 24 produced two completed trades, both long SMU, both entered during the Q2 double bottom and exited at game end.

# Trade Entry Exit Game Signal Return Kalshi entry (ask) Kalshi exit (bid) Kalshi return
1 Long SMU $0.750 (Q2 10:29) $0.950 (Q4 0:00) +26.7% — — —
2 Long SMU $0.684 (Q2 7:09) $0.950 (Q4 0:00) +38.9% — — —

Average: Game Signal +32.8%


Double Bottom in This Game

This California vs SMU market analysis Oct 24 shows a Double Bottom: two separate oversold entries on SMU during Q2, each bought as the game signal dipped below $0.750, before the Mustangs won 59-20. The pattern occurs when a team's game signal dips, partially recovers, then dips again before the second bounce carries the signal higher — two distinct troughs rather than a single V. Here, the first trough formed at $0.750 (RSI 18.3) after Mason Mini's touchdown, and the second at $0.684 (RSI 23.2) as California extended its lead to 17-10; SMU then scored 42 unanswered second-half points to resolve both positions. The full definition is on the [Patterns page](https://www.sportchartz.com/patterns/#double-bottom).

The California vs SMU market analysis Oct 24 confirms that spread-implied favorites can generate oversold entries even when trailing at halftime — and that the double bottom structure identified both of them.

Explore more NCAAF market analysis on SportChartz.

Table of Contents