2026-10-24
Login to see the interactive sport charts →
Houston vs Utah market analysis Oct 24: The Setup
Asset: Utah Utes (home favorite) | Opening: $0.685 | Spread: UTAH -6.5 | Kalshi: 67/68c
This Houston vs Utah market analysis Oct 24 opens with Utah entering Rice-Eccles Stadium at 6-0, hosting a Houston squad at 6-1 that had covered spreads consistently on the road. The Utes opened at $0.685 — a firm favorite price — but the spread implied a two-score cushion that Houston's defense would spend three quarters contesting. Devon Dampier's dual-threat ability was Utah's primary weapon; Conner Weigman's arm (282 yards on the night) was Houston's answer.
The Pattern: V-Bottom Recovery — Utah's game signal plunged from $0.685 to $0.253 through the third quarter, then reversed sharply to close at $0.950, tracing a clean V on the chart.
Going in: The $0.685 opening price reflected Utah's home-field edge and unbeaten record; a buy signal would require the signal to drop well below that level and show oversold momentum before re-entry.
Who Decided It
- Utah Utes (7-0): Devon Dampier ran 15 times for 150 yards and two touchdowns, including a 22-yard score in Q3 and a 9-yard game-winner in Q4; Wayshawn Parker added a 5-yard rushing touchdown.
- Houston Cougars (6-2): Conner Weigman completed 19 of 35 passes for 282 yards but was sacked three times in the fourth quarter and threw two interceptions; Jonathan Dimas's two field goals were Houston's only scoring outside Makhi Hughes's lone touchdown.
First Quarter: False Alarm
Outlook check: The pre-game outlook for Utah as a buy held — no score changed hands and the signal stayed above $0.50 through most of the quarter.
Houston's first drive stalled at the Utah 25 and punted. Utah's response drive moved 34 yards before punting back. The game signal drifted from $0.685 to $0.669 through the first exchanges. Houston's second possession pushed deep into Utah territory; Conner Weigman connected with Koby Young for 6 yards to the Utah 6 at Q1 5:46, and RSI on Utah's line fell to 20.2 — deeply oversold — as Houston threatened. The drive ultimately failed on downs at the Utah 3, and the signal recovered to $0.693 by quarter's end with RSI at 63.5.
| Time | Play | Score | Game Signal | RSI | Kalshi UTAH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 15:00 | Kickoff | HOU 0, UTAH 0 | $0.685 | — | 67/68c |
| Q1 9:14 | Liam Dougherty punt, Mana Carvalho return 0 yds | HOU 0, UTAH 0 | $0.669 | 47.5 | 66/67c |
| Q1 5:46 | Weigman to Koby Young, 6 yds to UTAH 6 | HOU 0, UTAH 0 | $0.539 | 20.2 | 55/57c |
| Q1 4:26 | RSI exits oversold | HOU 0, UTAH 0 | $0.603 | 45.8 | 63/65c |
| Q1 0:00 | End of Q1 | HOU 0, UTAH 0 | $0.693 | 63.5 | 67/68c |
Decision Point: Stay Out — Q1 Oversold Was a Threat, Not a Bottom
| Time | Score | Game Signal | RSI | MACD | Kalshi UTAH bid/ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 5:46 | HOU 0, UTAH 0 | $0.539 | 20.2 | — | 55/57c |
Known at the time: RSI hit 20.2 as Houston drove inside the Utah 10, threatening to score first. The signal had dropped 14.6 points from the open but the game was still scoreless and the drive had not yet resolved.
The decision: Stay out. The oversold reading reflected a live scoring threat, not a completed sell-off; entering before the drive concluded would have been chasing noise. The signal recovered to $0.693 by quarter's end without a trade.
Outlook for the next quarter: Utah needed to protect the ball and convert drives; a scoreless first quarter kept the signal near the opening price, but any Houston score would push the signal lower and potentially create a tradeable entry.
Second Quarter: Pressure Builds
Outlook check: The outlook for a potential entry held in reserve — Houston scored first, and the signal slipped to near-even by halftime.
Devon Dampier was sacked by Ashton Porter at Q2 12:06 (his first sack of the game), and RSI briefly touched overbought at 70.9 before reversing. Dampier's first interception — picked off by Kentrell Webb at the Houston end zone at Q2 11:28 — handed Houston possession and sent the signal to $0.634. A bullish divergence fired at Q2 5:19: Utah's game signal made a lower low at $0.478 while RSI posted a higher low (21.7 vs. the prior 19.8), suggesting sellers were losing momentum. Jonathan Dimas converted a 24-yard field goal at Q2 3:44 to put Houston up 3-0. Utah's Dillon Curtis missed a 34-yard attempt at Q2 0:02, and the half ended with the signal at $0.497 — essentially a coin flip.
| Time | Play | Score | Game Signal | RSI | Kalshi UTAH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 12:06 | Dampier sacked by Porter, -1 yd | HOU 0, UTAH 0 | $0.714 | 63.8 | 68/69c |
| Q2 11:28 | Dampier INT by Kentrell Webb, touchback | HOU 0, UTAH 0 | $0.634 | 37.6 | 59/60c |
| Q2 5:19 | Bullish divergence — RSI 21.7, higher low | HOU 0, UTAH 0 | $0.478 | 21.7 | 47/48c |
| Q2 3:44 | Dimas 24-yd FG | HOU 3, UTAH 0 | $0.559 | 45.5 | 54/55c |
| Q2 0:02 | Curtis 34-yd FG no good | HOU 3, UTAH 0 | $0.497 | 39.6 | 53/54c |
| Q2 0:00 | End of Q2 | HOU 3, UTAH 0 | $0.497 | 39.6 | 53/54c |
Decision Point: Hold — Divergence Noted, No Entry Yet
| Time | Score | Game Signal | RSI | MACD | Kalshi UTAH bid/ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 5:19 | HOU 0, UTAH 0 | $0.478 | 21.7 | — | 47/48c |
Known at the time: The bullish divergence at Q2 5:19 was a Phase 1 signal — RSI made a higher low while the game signal made a lower low. The game was still scoreless at that moment, and the minimum trade window of five minutes had not yet produced a clean entry setup.
The decision: Hold. The divergence was constructive but the signal had not yet found a stable floor; the missed field goal and 3-0 deficit at halftime kept the setup in observation mode.
Outlook for the next quarter: A Houston score early in Q3 would push the signal well below $0.40 and potentially create the oversold entry the divergence had foreshadowed.
Third Quarter: The V-Bottom Forms
Outlook check: The outlook for a deep oversold entry was confirmed — Houston scored twice in Q3 and Utah's signal collapsed to $0.253.
Houston opened the second half with a 15-play, 75-yard drive. Makhi Hughes carried the ball repeatedly — six rushes on the drive — and punched in a 2-yard touchdown at Q3 6:46 to put Houston up 10-0. The signal had already dropped to $0.400 at Q3 12:06 with RSI at 26.7, triggering Trade 1 entry: Long UTAH at $0.400. The entry play was Conner Weigman completing a short pass to Amare Thomas for 12 yards to the Utah 25 — Houston was moving the ball and the signal was deeply oversold. Hughes's touchdown then pushed the signal to its game low of $0.253 with RSI at 26.9, triggering Trade 2 entry: Long UTAH at $0.253 — the Kalshi ask was 30c. Devon Dampier answered immediately with a 5-play, 75-yard drive capped by a 22-yard touchdown run at Q3 4:25, lifting the signal to $0.459. Jonathan Dimas hit a 47-yard field goal at Q3 2:17 to push Houston back to 13-7, and Q3 ended at $0.459 with RSI at 62.1.
| Time | Play | Score | Game Signal | RSI | Kalshi UTAH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 12:06 | ENTRY Trade 1: Long UTAH — Weigman to Amare Thomas, 12 yds | HOU 3, UTAH 0 | $0.400 | 26.7 | 40/41c |
| Q3 8:13 | RSI exits oversold | HOU 3, UTAH 0 | $0.346 | 31.9 | 37/38c |
| Q3 6:46 | Hughes 2-yd TD run; ENTRY Trade 2: Long UTAH | HOU 10, UTAH 0 | $0.253 | 26.9 | 29/30c |
| Q3 4:25 | Dampier 22-yd TD run | HOU 10, UTAH 7 | $0.459 | 71.0 | 45/46c |
| Q3 2:17 | Dimas 47-yd FG | HOU 13, UTAH 7 | $0.371 | 47.3 | 43/44c |
| Q3 0:00 | End of Q3 | HOU 13, UTAH 7 | $0.459 | 62.1 | 52/53c |
Decision Point: Entry 1 — Long UTAH at $0.400 (Q3 12:06)
| Time | Score | Game Signal | RSI | MACD | Kalshi UTAH bid/ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 12:06 | HOU 3, UTAH 0 | $0.400 | 26.7 | -1.00 | 40/41c |
Known at the time: The game signal had fallen 28.5 points from the open to $0.400. RSI was at 26.7 — oversold — and the MACD histogram was at -1.00 (line -2.86, signal -1.87), showing sustained downward momentum. Houston was driving but had not yet scored in Q3. The signal was trading at a 28-point discount to the opening price with a full half of football remaining.
The decision: Enter Long UTAH at $0.400. The oversold RSI against a 6-0 home favorite trading at $0.40 met the entry threshold; the Kalshi ask was 41c.
Decision Point: Entry 2 — Long UTAH at $0.253 (Q3 6:46)
| Time | Score | Game Signal | RSI | MACD | Kalshi UTAH bid/ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 6:46 | HOU 10, UTAH 0 | $0.253 | 26.9 | -0.63 | 29/30c |
Known at the time: Hughes's touchdown pushed the signal to $0.253 — the game low. RSI remained at 26.9, still oversold. The MACD histogram was -0.63. Utah trailed 10-0 with just over six minutes left in Q3 but had not yet run an offensive play from scrimmage in the second half.
The decision: Add Long UTAH at $0.253. The signal had compressed 43.2 points from the open; RSI confirmed oversold conditions for the second time in the quarter. The Kalshi ask was 30c.
Outlook for the next quarter: Utah needed a score before the end of Q3 to keep the trade viable; a 10-point deficit with a quarter remaining was recoverable for a team with Dampier's legs.
Fourth Quarter: The Recovery Closes
Outlook check: The Q3 outlook was confirmed — Utah scored twice in Q4 to win 21-13, and both long positions closed profitably.
Utah's 10-play, 80-yard drive that began in Q3 ended at Q4 11:57 when Wayshawn Parker rushed 5 yards for a touchdown, cutting the deficit to 13-14 and sending the signal to $0.621. RSI hit 75.3 — overbought — as Utah took its first lead. Devon Dampier threw his second interception, picked off by Latreveon McCutchin at Q4 7:57, and the MACD histogram crossed bearish at the same clock. Jireh Moe sacked Weigman for -10 yards immediately after, and the signal held at $0.693. A MACD bullish cross fired at Q4 4:06 with the signal at $0.823. Jackson Bennee sacked Weigman for -11 yards at Q4 2:15 — Weigman's third sack of the quarter — and Dampier scored on a 9-yard run at Q4 2:09 to seal the 21-13 final. Both trades exited at Q4 0:00 with the signal at $0.950.
| Time | Play | Score | Game Signal | RSI | Kalshi UTAH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 11:57 | Parker 5-yd TD run | HOU 13, UTAH 14 | $0.621 | 75.3 | 63/65c |
| Q4 9:03 | RSI exits overbought | HOU 13, UTAH 14 | $0.692 | 66.7 | 77/78c |
| Q4 7:57 | Dampier INT by McCutchin; MACD bearish cross | HOU 13, UTAH 14 | $0.600 | 46.0 | 63/64c |
| Q4 4:06 | MACD bullish cross; bearish divergence noted | HOU 13, UTAH 14 | $0.823 | 67.3 | 81/82c |
| Q4 2:15 | Weigman sacked by Jackson Bennee, -11 yds | HOU 13, UTAH 14 | $0.996 | 77.2 | 84/85c |
| Q4 2:09 | Dampier 9-yd TD run | HOU 13, UTAH 21 | $0.973 | 73.0 | 94/95c |
| Q4 0:00 | EXIT Trade 1 +137.8% / EXIT Trade 2 +275.2% | HOU 13, UTAH 21 | $0.950 | 67.5 | — |
Decision Point: Exit Both Longs at Q4 0:00
| Time | Score | Game Signal | RSI | MACD | Kalshi UTAH bid/ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 0:00 | HOU 13, UTAH 21 | $0.950 | 67.5 | -0.59 | — |
Known at the time: The game ended. Utah won 21-13. Both long positions closed at the final whistle with the signal at $0.950.
The decision: Exit both Long UTAH positions at $0.950. Trade 1 returned +137.8%; Trade 2 returned +275.2%.
Final Accounting
This Houston vs Utah market analysis Oct 24 produced two completed long trades on Utah, both entered in Q3 during the V-Bottom Recovery and exited at game's end.
| # | Trade | Entry | Exit | Game Signal return | Kalshi entry (ask) | Kalshi exit (bid) | Kalshi return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Long UTAH | $0.400 (Q3 12:06) | $0.950 (Q4 0:00) | +137.8% | 41c | — | — |
| 2 | Long UTAH | $0.253 (Q3 6:46) | $0.950 (Q4 0:00) | +275.2% | 30c | — | — |
| Average | +206.5% |
V-Bottom Recovery in This Game
This Houston vs Utah market analysis Oct 24 is a clear example of the V-Bottom Recovery pattern. The V-Bottom Recovery describes a game where a team's game signal plunges, finds a floor, and climbs back at least 30 points — forming a V on the chart. Here, Utah's signal dropped from $0.685 at kickoff to $0.253 at Q3 6:46 (a 43.2-point decline), then reversed to $0.950 by the final whistle — a 69.7-point recovery. The two entry points at $0.400 and $0.253 captured the trough of that V, with Devon Dampier's legs providing the fundamental catalyst for the reversal. The full definition is on the [Patterns page](https://www.sportchartz.com/patterns/#v-bottom-recovery). This Houston vs Utah market analysis Oct 24 demonstrates how a deeply oversold favorite, still within striking distance, can deliver outsized returns when the signal finds its floor.
Explore more NCAAF market analysis on SportChartz.