Notre Dame Fighting Irish Overbought Exhaustion: $0.604 and $0.360 Entries Delivered +23.2% and +65.0% Returns

2026-10-17

Login to see the interactive sport charts →

Sports Market Analysis: The Technical Setup

This Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 reveals a textbook overbought exhaustion pattern that generated two distinct long entries on the Fighting Irish — one conservative, one aggressive — both resolving at the same exit point for a combined average ROI of 65.0%. The game unfolded at LaVell Edwards Stadium in Provo, Utah, before a crowd of 65,179, with Notre Dame entering as a heavy road favorite carrying a -10.5 spread against an undefeated BYU squad.

Asset: Notre Dame Fighting Irish (away favorite)

Opening Price: ~$0.781 (78.1% implied probability)

Spread: ND -10.5

The pre-game setup was straightforward on paper: Notre Dame at 6-1 was expected to handle a BYU team that, despite being 6-0, was catching the Irish at full strength. The market priced ND at $0.781 — a significant favorite. What the opening price couldn't capture was the volatility that would follow, as BYU's Bear Bachmeier repeatedly found ways to move the chains and keep the Cougars competitive. This Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 tracks how two overbought exhaustion signals in the second quarter created the entry windows that defined the entire trade thesis.

The Pattern: Overbought Exhaustion — RSI surged above 86 on the BYU game signal during a short-field scoring drive, then collapsed as Notre Dame's game signal simultaneously cratered, creating a deeply oversold entry opportunity for disciplined traders willing to fade the momentum spike.

---

Context: Why This Game Was a Technical Minefield

BYU Cougars (6-0 entering):

• Bear Bachmeier: 23/36, 224 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT — efficient but not dominant
• Kyler Kasper: 1/1, 15 yards, 1 TD — the spark play that changed the game's trajectory
• BYU's ground game repeatedly converted short-yardage situations, keeping drives alive and the clock moving

Notre Dame Fighting Irish (6-1 entering):

• CJ Carr: 27/49, 261 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT — high volume, low efficiency in the red zone
• Notre Dame's inability to convert scoring opportunities in the first half was the primary driver of the game signal collapse
• The Irish defense gave up two quick touchdowns in the second quarter that triggered the oversold conditions our market analysis identified as entry points

The spread of -10.5 implied Notre Dame would win comfortably, but BYU's home-field advantage at LaVell Edwards Stadium — one of the most hostile environments in college football — was underpriced by the market. This Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 shows that the opening $0.781 price was technically justified but left no margin for the volatility that BYU's offense would generate. The real trading opportunity emerged not from the opening price but from the overbought exhaustion that followed BYU's early scoring burst.

---

First Quarter: BYU's Early Momentum Spike

The Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 begins with a deceptive opening sequence. Notre Dame's game signal opened at $0.781, reflecting the heavy favorite status, but BYU immediately put pressure on that valuation. At Q1 9:21, Bachmeier punched in a 5-yard rushing touchdown to give BYU a 7-0 lead, and the RSI on the BYU signal exploded — hitting 81.1 at that exact moment. This was the first overbought warning flag of the afternoon.

The RSI continued to register overbought readings throughout the first quarter, peaking at 85.2 at Q1 10:41 as Notre Dame called a timeout to regroup. The BYU game signal was surging on the back of a touchdown and strong field position, but the momentum indicators were already flashing caution. At Q1 5:10, a bearish divergence signal fired: BYU's game signal made a higher high (36.2% vs. prior 35.9%) while RSI made a lower high (72.6 vs. prior 81.1) — a classic sign that buying pressure was weakening even as the price continued to tick up.

Notre Dame answered with a Sam Porath 46-yard field goal at Q1 5:06, trimming the deficit to 7-3 and confirming that the Irish offense, while not explosive, was functional. The quarter ended with BYU holding a 7-3 lead and Notre Dame's game signal at $0.709 — down from the opening $0.781 but not yet at a tradeable oversold level.

Decision Point 1: The Bearish Divergence Warning

The Question: With BYU's RSI making lower highs while the game signal makes higher highs, is the early BYU momentum sustainable?

This Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 identified the Q1 5:10 bearish divergence as a critical early signal. The divergence pattern — BYU's game signal ticking higher while RSI momentum faded — suggested the Cougars' early advantage was built on thin technical foundations. A disciplined trader would note this signal but wait for a more definitive entry, as the game signal hadn't yet reached oversold territory. The field goal at Q1 5:06 partially confirmed the thesis, but the real setup was still developing.

---

Second Quarter: The Overbought Exhaustion Entry

The second quarter is where this Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 gets its primary trade thesis. Notre Dame's game signal, which had recovered to $0.709 at the end of Q1, came under severe pressure as BYU orchestrated two scoring drives in rapid succession.

At Q2 10:37, Notre Dame running back N. James Jr. rushed for an 8-yard touchdown to give the Irish a 10-7 lead — and the ND game signal briefly spiked. But BYU responded immediately. Kyler Kasper connected with Bachmeier on a 15-yard touchdown pass at Q2 5:52, giving BYU a 14-10 lead and sending the BYU RSI into extreme overbought territory. At Q2 5:52, RSI hit 78.3 and continued climbing — reaching 80.1 at Q2 5:45, then 84.0 at Q2 4:56, and finally peaking at an extreme 86.0 at Q2 4:27.

This RSI extreme overbought reading at 86.0 was the setup signal. The BYU game signal was surging on the back of a momentum touchdown, but the RSI was screaming exhaustion. Notre Dame's game signal had collapsed to $0.584 at Q2 4:27 — a significant drop from the opening $0.781.

Trade 1 Entry (Q2 4:56): At sequence 58, with the ND game signal at $0.604 and BYU's RSI at 84.0 — extreme overbought — the first entry signal fired. CJ Carr was operating in no-huddle shotgun, moving the chains with short completions, and the technical picture showed BYU's momentum was peaking. The RSI extreme overbought reading at 84.0 was the trigger for a conservative long entry on Notre Dame at $0.604.

Then came the decisive moment. At Q2 4:26, BYU punted — and the game signal whipsawed violently. The punt gave BYU possession back, and Bachmeier immediately hit a short pass that set up a quick scoring drive. At Q2 1:29, Bachmeier rushed for a 1-yard touchdown to give BYU a 21-10 lead, and Notre Dame's game signal cratered to $0.360. The RSI on the ND signal plunged to an extreme 5.4 — deeply, historically oversold.

Trade 2 Entry (Q2 4:26): At sequence 60, with the ND game signal at $0.360 and RSI at extreme oversold levels, the second and more aggressive entry signal fired. This was the overbought exhaustion pattern in full effect: BYU's RSI had peaked at 94.6-94.8 (sequences 64-65) following the touchdown, while Notre Dame's signal had collapsed to levels that implied near-certain defeat. The market was pricing in a BYU blowout — but with 11+ minutes of game clock remaining in the second half, the technical setup favored a mean reversion trade.

Decision Point 2: The Dual Entry Setup

The Question: With BYU's RSI at 94.6 (extreme overbought) and Notre Dame's game signal collapsed to $0.360, is this a capitulation buy or a legitimate collapse?

This Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 identified this as a high-conviction overbought exhaustion entry. BYU's RSI at 94.6 represented one of the most extreme overbought readings possible — a level that historically precedes sharp mean reversion. Notre Dame, despite trailing 14-10 at the entry point, had CJ Carr moving the ball efficiently in no-huddle sets, and the Irish defense had the talent to force stops. The deficit with over 30 minutes of game clock remaining was significant but not insurmountable for a team of Notre Dame's caliber. The market was pricing panic; the technicals were pricing opportunity.

---

Third Quarter: BYU Extends — But the Thesis Holds

The Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 enters its most challenging phase in the third quarter. Notre Dame's game signal remained depressed as BYU continued to control the line of scrimmage. At Q3 11:58, BYU's RSI hit 76.1 — another overbought reading — as Bachmeier completed short passes to move the chains. The BYU game signal climbed to $0.761 (76.1% home win probability), and at Q3 8:03, a bearish divergence fired again: BYU's game signal made a higher high (78.2% vs. prior 76.1%) while RSI made a lower high (72.8 vs. 76.1).

This repeated bearish divergence pattern was the technical confirmation that BYU's dominance was built on momentum rather than sustainable execution. The Cougars were winning the possession battle but not converting at the rate their game signal implied.

Notre Dame's defense began to assert itself in the third quarter. A fumble recovery by ND's B. Frazier at the BYU 41-yard line at Q3 7:23 gave the Irish prime field position, and Sam Porath converted a 31-yard field goal at Q3 3:17 to make it 21-13. Another Porath field goal from 39 yards at Q3 0:11 trimmed the deficit to 21-16. Notre Dame's game signal climbed from $0.357 to $0.416 by the end of the third quarter — not yet at the exit target, but the mean reversion was clearly underway.

The RSI on the BYU signal dropped to oversold territory at Q3 1:40 (29.9) and Q3 1:35 (29.5) as Notre Dame's back-to-back field goals drained BYU's momentum. The market was beginning to reprice the game.

Decision Point 3: Holding Through the Drawdown

The Question: With the ND game signal dropping to $0.218 — well below both entry prices — should a trader exit to cut losses or hold the position?

This Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 shows why patience is the critical variable in overbought exhaustion trades. The bearish divergence on BYU's signal at Q3 8:03 was the third such signal in the game — each one confirming that BYU's momentum was unsustainable. Notre Dame's two-score deficit was real, but the Irish were moving the ball and converting field goals. The RSI on BYU's signal was still overbought at 72.8, meaning the mean reversion had not yet fully played out. Holding was the technically correct decision.

---

Fourth Quarter: The Notre Dame Comeback and Exit Signal

The fourth quarter is where this Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 reaches its resolution. Notre Dame entered the final period trailing 21-16 — a one-possession game — and the game signal reflected the tightening contest at $0.416.

The quarter opened with BYU facing a delay of game penalty at Q4 14:20, and Notre Dame's CJ Carr immediately went to work. Carr completed a deep pass to J. Greathouse at Q4 13:35 for a significant gain, and the Irish drove down the field. At Q4 9:31, J. Walton punched in a 3-yard rushing touchdown to give Notre Dame a 24-21 lead — the third lead change of the game. Notre Dame's game signal surged to $0.745 (74.5%), and the RSI on the BYU signal plunged to 25.6 — deeply oversold.

Exit Signal (Q4 9:31): At this exact moment, both trades reached their exit point. The system identified Q4 9:31 as the exit sequence for both Trade 1 and Trade 2, with the ND game signal at $0.745.

• Trade 1 (entered at $0.604): Return = ($0.745 – $0.604) / $0.604 × 100 = +23.2%
• Trade 2 (entered at $0.360): Return = ($0.745 – $0.360) / $0.360 × 100 = +106.9%

The exit at Q4 9:31 was technically justified by the lead change and the RSI plunge on BYU's signal to 25.6 — a signal that the mean reversion had fully played out and a new equilibrium was being established. Holding beyond this point introduced new risk, as BYU still had over 9 minutes to respond.

What followed validated the exit timing. At Q4 8:05, Bachmeier threw an interception to J. Sanders at the ND 15-yard line — a bullish divergence signal for Notre Dame that briefly pushed the game signal higher. The MACD bullish crossover at Q4 7:17 confirmed the momentum shift. But then BYU mounted a final drive, and at Q4 1:47, Bachmeier completed a 6-yard touchdown pass to W. Lyons to give BYU a 28-24 lead — the fourth and final lead change of the game. Notre Dame's game signal collapsed to $0.131 (13.1%), and the RSI spiked to 75.4 on BYU's signal — another overbought reading, but one that came too late to matter for our trade.

CJ Carr's final drive — 27 completions on 49 attempts for 261 yards — couldn't produce the tying score. The Irish drove to the BYU 8-yard line but Carr's final pass fell incomplete, and BYU held on for a 28-24 victory.

Decision Point 4: The Exit at Q4 9:31

The Question: With Notre Dame having just taken the lead and the game signal at $0.745, is this the right exit point or should a trader hold for a higher price?

The Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 confirms Q4 9:31 as the optimal exit. The lead change to Notre Dame represented the full realization of the mean reversion thesis — the overbought exhaustion pattern had played out exactly as the technicals predicted. With 9+ minutes remaining and BYU still possessing the ball, holding the position introduced significant tail risk. The RSI on BYU's signal at 25.6 (oversold) suggested BYU was due for a momentum bounce, and the game's history of lead changes (three already) argued for taking profits at the first favorable exit. The +23.2% and +106.9% returns were the reward for disciplined entry and exit execution.

---

Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17: Final Accounting

This Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 produced two completed long trades on the Notre Dame Fighting Irish, both entered during the overbought exhaustion window in the second quarter and both exited at the Q4 9:31 lead change.

Trade 1 was the conservative entry — catching the RSI extreme overbought reading at 84.0 on BYU's signal while Notre Dame's game signal was at $0.604. The return of +23.2% reflects a solid but measured mean reversion. Trade 2 was the aggressive entry — entering at $0.360 after BYU's RSI hit 94.6 following the go-ahead touchdown. The +106.9% return reflects the full depth of the overbought exhaustion pattern. Together, the average ROI of 65.0% represents a strong outcome from a single game's technical setup.

The game ultimately ended with BYU winning 28-24 on a late Bachmeier touchdown pass to W. Lyons — but the trade was closed well before that final score, at the Q4 9:31 lead change that represented the peak of Notre Dame's momentum recovery.

---

Sports Market Analysis: Overbought Exhaustion Pattern Spotlight

This Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 is a case study in the overbought exhaustion pattern — one of the most reliable setups in college football market analysis. The pattern occurs when a team's game signal RSI surges above 80-85 on the back of a momentum scoring play, creating an extreme reading that is statistically unsustainable. The opposing team's game signal simultaneously collapses to oversold levels, creating a mean reversion entry opportunity.

The overbought exhaustion pattern is distinct from a simple oversold bounce because it requires the RSI extreme to occur on the *opponent's* signal — not just the traded team's signal. In this game, BYU's RSI hitting 86.0 and then 94.6 was the trigger, not Notre Dame's RSI alone. This dual-signal confirmation is what separates high-confidence entries from noise.

How to Identify:

• Opponent's RSI surges above 80 on a momentum scoring play (touchdown, three-pointer run, etc.)
• Traded team's game signal drops 15+ percentage points from its recent high
• RSI on the traded team's signal reaches oversold territory (<30) simultaneously
• The game clock shows sufficient time remaining for mean reversion (minimum 15-20 minutes)
• A bearish divergence on the opponent's signal (higher game signal, lower RSI) provides additional confirmation

Trading Logic:

• Entry: When opponent's RSI exceeds 84 and traded team's game signal has dropped 15%+ from recent high
• Position sizing: Conservative entry at first RSI extreme (84+), aggressive entry at second extreme (90+)
• Exit: At the first lead change or when traded team's game signal reaches 70%+
• Risk management: If opponent scores again within 3 minutes of entry, the pattern is invalidating — consider reducing position

Historical Context: In college football market analysis, overbought exhaustion patterns following momentum touchdowns have a strong historical success rate when the traded team is a pre-game favorite with sufficient game clock remaining. The key variable is time: patterns triggered with less than 10 minutes remaining carry significantly higher risk of not completing the mean reversion. This game's entries at Q2 4:56 and Q2 4:26 — with over 30 minutes of game clock remaining — represented near-ideal timing for the pattern.

The Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 also illustrates the value of multiple entries at different price levels. The $0.604 entry provided a lower-risk position with a +23.2% return; the $0.360 entry provided a higher-risk, higher-reward position with a +106.9% return. Portfolio construction across both entries averaged to +65.0% — a return that reflects both the pattern's reliability and the game's inherent volatility.

---

Quick Reference

---

The Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 stands as a clear demonstration of how RSI overbought exhaustion signals can identify high-value entry points even when the game narrative appears to favor the opponent. Two entries, one exit, and an average ROI of 65.0% — all driven by disciplined adherence to the technical signals rather than the scoreboard. This Notre Dame vs BYU market analysis Oct 17 confirms that in college football market analysis, the most profitable trades often come when the crowd is most convinced the game is over.

Explore more NCAAF market analysis on SportChartz.