Pittsburgh Penguins V-Bottom Recovery: $0.209 Entry at RSI 1.0 Delivered +354.3% Return

Utah MammothUTA 4 — 3 PITPittsburgh Penguins
2026-10-29

2026-10-29

Login to see the interactive sport charts →

Utah vs Pittsburgh market analysis Oct 29: The Setup

Asset: Pittsburgh Penguins (home underdog) | Opening: $0.457 | Spread: PIT +1.5 (puck line) | Kalshi: 45/46c

This Utah vs Pittsburgh market analysis Oct 29 opens with Pittsburgh as the home underdog — the moneyline gave them only a 45.7% pre-game chance against a Utah Mammoth squad carrying a 9-5-0 record and 18 points. The Penguins sat at 5-6-2 with 12 points, a team fighting for traction in the early season. Utah's Logan Cooley had been one of the league's more dangerous young forwards, and PPG Paints Arena drew 15,383 fans expecting a competitive game.

The Pattern: V-Bottom Recovery — Pittsburgh's game signal plunged from $0.457 to $0.209 inside the first period as Utah scored twice, then climbed all the way to $0.950 by late in the third, tracing a deep V on the chart.

Going in: The opening price at $0.457 reflected a slight underdog lean; a buy signal would require Pittsburgh's game signal to drop into deeply oversold territory and show momentum stabilization before re-entry.


Who Decided It

  • Utah Mammoth (10-5-0 after this game): Logan Cooley was the story — three goals including the tying tip-in with one second left in regulation and the overtime winner set up by Mikhail Sergachev's wrist shot at OT 1:33.
  • Pittsburgh Penguins (5-7-2 after this game): Ben Kindel (1G, 1A) and Evgeni Malkin (2A) drove the third-period comeback, but Arturs Silovs allowed four goals on 34 shots and the team couldn't hold a one-goal lead with 25 seconds left.

First Period: Collapse

Outlook check: The pre-game setup called for a competitive game near the opening price. It did not hold — Pittsburgh's game signal fell off a cliff inside the first five minutes of play.

Early momentum briefly favored Pittsburgh. A Clayton Keller hooking penalty at P1 19:11 gave the Penguins a power play, and RSI spiked to 100.0 as Pittsburgh generated early pressure — Nick Robertson's wrist shot was stopped by Sebastian Cossa, Connor Dewar's attempt was blocked by Mikhail Sergachev. RSI exited overbought territory at P1 17:41 ($0.475, RSI 52.8) as the power play expired without a goal. The game signal drifted back toward opening. Then Logan Cooley struck unassisted at P1 15:20 — a wrist shot that sent RSI crashing to 4.2 and triggered a MACD bearish cross. Pittsburgh's game signal dropped to $0.351. The Penguins pressed but couldn't convert: Evgeni Malkin's wrist shot was stopped, Kris Letang's shot was blocked, giveaways piled up. RSI briefly recovered to 33.2 at P1 6:41 as Pittsburgh generated some zone time. Then Cooley struck again at P1 5:49 — a wrist shot assisted by Lawson Crouse and Andrew Peeke — and the game signal collapsed to $0.209, RSI 1.0, a second MACD bearish cross firing simultaneously.

Time Play Score Game Signal RSI Kalshi PIT
P1 20:00 Opening UTA 0, PIT 0 $0.457 — 45/46c
P1 19:11 Keller hooking penalty UTA 0, PIT 0 $0.485 100.0 46/47c
P1 17:41 RSI exits overbought UTA 0, PIT 0 $0.475 52.8 45/46c
P1 15:20 Cooley goal (unassisted) UTA 1, PIT 0 $0.351 4.2 33/34c
P1 6:41 RSI exits oversold UTA 1, PIT 0 $0.342 33.2 20/23c
P1 5:49 Cooley goal (Crouse, Peeke) UTA 2, PIT 0 $0.209 1.0 20/23c

Decision Point: Long PIT at the Logan Cooley Goal

Time Score Game Signal RSI MACD Kalshi PIT bid/ask
P1 5:49 UTA 2, PIT 0 $0.209 1.0 −0.65 hist 20/23c

Known at the time: Logan Cooley's second goal of the period — a wrist shot off assists from Crouse and Peeke — pushed Pittsburgh's game signal to $0.209 with RSI at 1.0, the deepest oversold reading of the game to that point. The MACD histogram was negative at −0.65 (line −1.74, signal −1.10), confirming downward momentum. Pittsburgh trailed 2-0 with 5:49 left in the first period. The Kalshi market quoted PIT at 20/23c. This Utah vs Pittsburgh market analysis Oct 29 identified this as the V-bottom entry: extreme oversold conditions with 14+ minutes of hockey remaining across two full periods.

The decision: Enter Long PIT at $0.209. RSI at 1.0 with a two-goal deficit in the first period represented a deeply discounted price on a team that opened near even money.

Outlook for the next period: Pittsburgh needed to generate sustained pressure and cut the deficit to one goal. A Penguins goal in the second period would confirm the recovery thesis; another Utah goal would extend the position's drawdown.


Second Period: Stabilization

Outlook check: Pittsburgh did not score immediately, but the game signal held above its first-period lows and began building a base — the position stayed open.

The second period opened with Pittsburgh's game signal at $0.196, RSI still in oversold territory at 23.4. Pittsburgh generated shots — Nick Robertson, Declan Carlile, Kris Letang, and Sidney Crosby all tested Cossa — but Utah's goalie held firm through the first eight minutes. A second bullish divergence signal appeared at P2 11:35: Pittsburgh's game signal had made a lower low ($0.166, RSI 14.0) versus the prior low ($0.194, RSI 11.8), with RSI making a higher low — sellers weakening. Then Erik Karlsson converted at P2 11:22, a wrist shot assisted by Ben Kindel and Evgeni Malkin, sending RSI to 96.8 and the game signal to $0.308. RSI exited overbought at P2 6:45 ($0.292, RSI 68.0) as the period wound down. Pittsburgh closed the second at $0.260, RSI 18.0.

Time Play Score Game Signal RSI Kalshi PIT
P2 11:35 Bullish divergence signal UTA 2, PIT 0 $0.166 14.0 26/28c
P2 11:22 Karlsson goal (Kindel, Malkin) UTA 2, PIT 1 $0.308 96.8 26/28c
P2 6:45 RSI exits overbought UTA 2, PIT 1 $0.292 68.0 26/27c
P2 0:00 End of P2 UTA 2, PIT 1 $0.260 18.0 24/25c

Decision Point: Hold Through the Second Period

Known at the time: Karlsson's goal cut the deficit to one. The game signal recovered from $0.166 to $0.308 on the goal, then settled at $0.260 by period's end. RSI remained in oversold territory at 18.0 — the position had not yet reached an exit signal.

The decision: Hold Long PIT. The game signal was recovering, the deficit was one goal, and RSI had not approached overbought levels that would signal an exit.

Outlook for the third period: A Pittsburgh equalizer would push the game signal sharply higher. The position needed RSI to climb toward overbought territory to generate an exit signal.


Third Period: The Comeback

Outlook check: The third period delivered exactly what the position needed — Pittsburgh tied it, then took the lead, driving the game signal to near-maximum levels.

Pittsburgh's game signal opened the third at $0.260, RSI 18.0, still oversold. Utah pressed hard — MacKenzie Weegar fired three blocked shots in the opening 45 seconds, and the Penguins were pinned back. RSI continued falling: by P3 10:02, Erik Karlsson took a tripping penalty against Logan Cooley and RSI hit 0.0 — the absolute floor. Then Rickard Rakell converted at P3 9:01, a wrist shot assisted by Kaedan Korczak, tying the game 2-2. The game signal jumped to $0.456, RSI 91.1, with a MACD bullish cross confirming the momentum shift. Pittsburgh held the tie through the middle of the period, game signal hovering around $0.480. With 27 seconds left, Ben Kindel scored off a Malkin-Chinakhov setup — game signal spiked to $0.976, RSI 99.8, MACD bullish cross firing. The exit signal was clear.

Time Play Score Game Signal RSI Kalshi PIT
P3 10:02 Karlsson tripping penalty UTA 2, PIT 1 $0.150 0.0 15/16c
P3 9:01 Rakell goal (Korczak) UTA 2, PIT 2 $0.456 91.1 44/45c
P3 0:25 Kindel goal (Malkin, Chinakhov) UTA 2, PIT 3 $0.976 99.8 88/94c

Decision Point: Exit Long PIT at the Kindel Goal

Time Score Game Signal RSI MACD Kalshi PIT bid/ask
P3 0:25 UTA 2, PIT 3 $0.950 99.8 +2.27 hist 88/94c

Known at the time: Ben Kindel's goal with 25 seconds left gave Pittsburgh a 3-2 lead. The game signal was at $0.950 (exit price), RSI at 99.8 — extreme overbought. MACD histogram was +2.27. The Kalshi market quoted PIT at 88/94c. This Utah vs Pittsburgh market analysis Oct 29 marks this as the exit: RSI at maximum, game signal near $1.00, 25 seconds of regulation remaining.

The decision: Exit Long PIT at $0.950. RSI 99.8 with 25 seconds left and a one-goal lead represented the peak of the V-bottom recovery. The position returned +354.3% on the game signal.

What followed was not part of the trade: Logan Cooley's tip-in with one second left (assisted by Vincent Trocheck and Clayton Keller) tied the game 3-3, and Mikhail Sergachev's wrist shot at OT 1:33 — set up by Barrett Hayton — won it for Utah. The exit at P3 0:25 captured the full recovery before the collapse.


Final Accounting

This Utah vs Pittsburgh market analysis Oct 29 produced one completed trade with a game signal return of +354.3%.

Trade Entry Exit Game Signal return Kalshi entry (ask) Kalshi exit (bid) Kalshi return
Long PIT (P1 5:49) $0.209 $0.950 (P3 0:25) +354.3% 23c 88c +282.6%

Average: Game Signal +354.3% | Kalshi +282.6%

The Game Signal return is the model's price; the Kalshi return is what the market paid, buying at the ask and selling at the bid. Trade 1 (+282.6% on Kalshi vs +354.3%) bought at 23c against $0.209 and sold at 88c against $0.950, so Kalshi paid less.


V-Bottom Recovery in This Game

This Utah vs Pittsburgh market analysis Oct 29 is a study in the V-Bottom Recovery pattern. A V-Bottom Recovery occurs when a team's game signal plunges sharply, finds a floor, and climbs back at least 30 points — forming a V on the chart — with the trade entered near the bottom. Here, Pittsburgh's game signal dropped from $0.457 at opening to $0.209 after Cooley's second goal, RSI at 1.0, then recovered all the way to $0.950 by P3 0:25 — a 74.1-point swing. The entry at the exact moment of maximum pessimism, and the exit at near-maximum confidence with 25 seconds left, captured the full arc of the pattern. The full definition is on the [Patterns page](https://www.sportchartz.com/patterns/#v-bottom-recovery).

This Utah vs Pittsburgh market analysis Oct 29 shows that even a two-goal deficit in the first period, with RSI at 1.0, can resolve into a tradeable recovery when the underlying price was discounted far below the team's true competitive level.

Explore more NHL market analysis on SportChartz.

Table of Contents